<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>有啊SEO &#187; Matt Cutts博客</title>
	<atom:link href="http://youaseo.com/archives/tag/matt-cutts%e5%8d%9a%e5%ae%a2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://youaseo.com</link>
	<description>又一个 WordPress 博客</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Matt Cutts解释Google并非提升大品牌排名</title>
		<link>http://youaseo.com/archives/matt-cutts-brands.html</link>
		<comments>http://youaseo.com/archives/matt-cutts-brands.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google优化]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google官方]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts博客]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[品牌排名]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youaseo.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts在下面这段视频很好的解释品牌在搜索引擎中的排名算法
Googel此次算法的更新并不是因为品牌，排名的决定因素更多是因为：网站的信任度，PageRank和权重。
Is Google putting more weight on brands in rankings?视频中有一句话是说：我不认为我们放更多权限在品牌上。而是反馈给用户多样化的结果。一切以用户为中心，给出高质量的搜索搜索结果
Matt Cutts也肯定的说了，Google确实更新了算法。他自己称不是更新，只是一个简单的改变。
相对与百度而言，完全是走品牌路线，比如你在搜索中输入：&#8221;NOKIA&#8221;排在第一个的就是诺基亚官方网站，而排第二第三的照样是拿来竞价，还有一些不是很出名的百度也是施行人工干预，比如上次在论坛看到的“国学”后面都是竞价的就第一个是快照。所以对一些网络比较了解的人在使用百度的时候都是直接点第二页，因为第一页都是推广，不像google始终把用户体验放第一位。不过在中国大部分网民自我防范意识都不高所以百度的市场才会做那么的大。。一般我都是先用google在用百度来找自己需要的东西。

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Cutts在下面这段视频很好的解释品牌在搜索引擎中的<a title="排名" href="http://youaseo.com">排名算法</a><br />
Googel此次算法的更新并不是因为<strong>品牌</strong>，排名的决定因素更多是因为：网站的信任度，PageRank和权重。<br />
Is Google putting more weight on brands in rankings?视频中有一句话是说：我不认为我们放更多权限在<strong>品牌</strong>上。而是反馈给用户多样化的结果。一切以用户为中心，给出高质量的搜索搜索结果<span id="more-255"></span><br />
Matt Cutts也肯定的说了，Google确实更新了算法。他自己称不是更新，只是一个简单的改变。<br />
相对与百度而言，完全是走品牌路线，比如你在搜索中输入：&#8221;NOKIA&#8221;排在第一个的就是诺基亚官方网站，而排第二第三的照样是拿来竞价，还有一些不是很出名的百度也是施行人工干预，比如上次在论坛看到的“国学”后面都是竞价的就第一个是快照。所以对一些网络比较了解的人在使用百度的时候都是直接点第二页，因为第一页都是推广，不像google始终把用户体验放第一位。不过在中国大部分网民自我防范意识都不高所以百度的市场才会做那么的大。。一般我都是先用google在用百度来找自己需要的东西。</p>
<p><object width="423" height="325" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/LMfWPWUh5uU&amp;hl=zh_CN&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LMfWPWUh5uU&amp;hl=zh_CN&amp;fs=1" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://youaseo.com/archives/matt-cutts-brands.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Cutts博客更新,这次讲的是每个网页多少个链接为好的理论阐述。</title>
		<link>http://youaseo.com/archives/matt-cutts-links-per-page.html</link>
		<comments>http://youaseo.com/archives/matt-cutts-links-per-page.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google优化]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google官方]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts博客]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[页面链接]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youaseo.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9日,Matt Cutts又有话讲了,但这次讲的是每个网页多少个链接为好?
原文：How Many Links per page?
I’m about to publish a blog post with a ton of links in it — almost two hundred of them. So before I did that, it seemed like a good time to talk about Google’s recommendation to “Keep the links on a given page to a reasonable number (fewer than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9日,Matt Cutts又有话讲了,但这次讲的是每个网页多少个链接为好?<br />
原文：<a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/how-many-links-per-page/" target="_blank">How Many Links per page?</a></p>
<p>I’m about to publish a blog post with a ton of links in it — almost two hundred of them. So before I did that, it seemed like a good time to talk about Google’s recommendation to “<a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769" target="_blank">Keep the links on a given page to a reasonable number (fewer than 100).</a>” Why do we provide that recommendation, and what if you decide to ignore that guidance?<span id="more-252"></span></p>
<p>The original reason we provided that recommendation is that Google used to index only about 100 kilobytes of a page. When we thought about how many links a page might reasonably have and still be under 100K, it seemed about right to recommend 100 links or so. If a page started to have more than that many links, there was a chance that the page would be so long that Google would truncate the page and wouldn’t index the entire page.</p>
<p>These days, Google will index more than 100K of a page, but there’s still a good reason to recommend keeping to under a hundred links or so: the user experience. If you’re showing well over 100 links per page, you could be overwhelming your users and giving them a bad experience. A page might look good to you until you put on your “user hat” and see what it looks like to a new visitor.</p>
<p>But in some cases, it might make sense to have more than a hundred links. Does Google automatically consider a page spam if your page has over 100 links? No, not at all. The “100 links” recommendation is in the “Design and content” guidelines section, and it’s the Quality guidelines that contain the things that we consider webspam (stuff like hidden text, doorway pages, installing malware, etc.). Can pages with over 100 links be spammy? Sure, especially if those links are hidden or keyword-stuffed. But pages with lots of links are not automatically considered spammy by Google.</p>
<p>So how might Google treat pages with well over a hundred links? If you end up with hundreds of links on a page, Google might choose not to follow or to index all those links. At any rate, you’re dividing the PageRank of that page between hundreds of links, so each link is only going to pass along a minuscule amount of PageRank anyway. Users often dislike link-heavy pages too, so before you go overboard putting a ton of links on a page, ask yourself what the purpose of the page is and whether it works well for the user experience.</p>
<p>其实最基本的原理是Google收录网页的大小是100K/页（最近几天加大），太多的链接会使得网页过大，而Google自动会截去多余部分，收录的网页不完整,不利于<a title="seo" href="http://youaseo.com" target="_self">搜索引擎优化</a>。</p>
<p>其中强调的是一个网页超过100个链接并不认为是SPAM或作弊，而是对于用户不太好友，蜘蛛抓取也是一方面。</p>
<p>当然如果自然的链接超过100个，Google不认为是作弊，但网页的质量得分应该不会很高。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://youaseo.com/archives/matt-cutts-links-per-page.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

